Defending the Filibuster: Updated Guidelines for Senate Defense

In the ongoing debate surrounding the Senate filibuster, critics argue that it undermines democracy and potentially violates the Constitution. Recent legislative conflicts have intensified scrutiny of Senate procedures, sparking discussions on the need for filibuster reform or abolition. In their book Defending the Filibuster , Senate experts Richard A. Arenberg and Robert B. Dove passionately advocate for the filibuster, asserting its vital role in upholding minority rights, ensuring governmental stability and thoughtful decision-making, and safeguarding the principles of checks and balances and separation of powers. Through a detailed historical analysis of Senate rules and procedures, the authors make a compelling case for thoughtful reforms to strengthen this key aspect of Senate operations.

Stay current with the latest Senate events in this updated edition, which includes a new chapter detailing the 2012–13 events that first triggered the use of the "nuclear option" to restrict the filibuster for presidential nominations. Also, enjoy a fresh foreword by former US Senator Olympia Snowe. The authors present an insightful analysis on potential Senate rule changes and put forth their own reform recommendations.